Sponsored赞助内容
Connecting AI agents to enterprise knowledge将 AI 智能体连接到企业知识
A strong structural foundation that links data and agents is key for context-rich agentic AI that scales.连接数据与智能体的强大结构基础,是打造可扩展且具备丰富上下文的智能体 AI 的关键。
In partnership withNeo4j与 Neo4j 合作
For all the data that AI systems continually amass and analyze, enterprise AI agents often suffer from a curious shortcoming: a lack of knowledge. More than data, knowledge is the understanding of what the data means in the context of individual organizations. AI agents need this understanding to reason about situations, make decisions, and ultimately take actions. Without sufficient knowledge, agents are prone to making flawed and unreliable decisions. 尽管 AI 系统不断积累和分析大量数据,企业 AI 智能体却常常存在一个令人费解的短板:缺乏知识。知识不仅仅是数据,它是对数据在具体组织语境中意味着什么的理解。AI 智能体需要这种理解来推断情境、做出决策,并最终采取行动。如果缺乏足够的知识,智能体就容易做出有缺陷且不可靠的决策。
A lack of knowledge, our research finds, is a major reason agentic AI use cases never make it to production. Competitive pressure is making it urgent to address this. Organizations need to deploy and scale more of their agentic projects to capture the efficiency gains AI promises. Falling short risks wasting the investment already sunk into these projects, and it cedes ground to rivals already putting their agents to work more effectively.我们的研究发现,缺乏知识是智能体 AI 用例始终无法投入生产的一个主要原因。竞争压力正使解决这一问题变得紧迫。组织需要部署并扩展更多智能体项目,以获取 AI 所承诺的效率提升。若做不到,就可能浪费已投入这些项目的资金,并把优势让给那些已更有效地让智能体投入工作的竞争对手。

The purpose of this report, which is based on a survey of 300 data, AI, and other technology executives, is threefold. First, it seeks to gauge organizations’ agentic knowledge capabilities (i.e., their ability to give AI agents a full contextual understanding of the data they ingest) across semantic knowledge, episodic memory, and procedural knowledge. 本报告基于对 300 名数据、AI 及其他技术高管的调查,其目的有三个。第一,报告试图评估组织的智能体知识能力(即其让 AI 智能体完整理解所摄取数据的语境的能力),涵盖语义知识、情景记忆和程序性知识。
Second, the report probes the challenges organizations face in improving access to knowledge and ultimately to getting more agent use cases into production. Third, it explores the measures organizations are taking to overcome these challenges. 第二,报告探讨了组织在改善知识获取以及最终让更多智能体用例投入生产方面所面临的挑战。第三,报告考察了组织为克服这些挑战正在采取的措施。

The key findings include the following: 主要发现包括:
Data and knowledge weaknesses consistently stall AI agent progress. On average, only around a third (34%) of organizations’ agentic AI projects make it into production. Even high-tech firms struggle with this. Legacy data systems, security and privacy concerns, and a lack of knowledge and context are the key points of failure. 数据与知识方面的薄弱环节持续阻碍 AI 智能体取得进展。平均而言,组织只有约三分之一(34%)的智能体 AI 项目能够投入生产。即便是高科技公司也难以做到这一点。遗留数据系统、安全与隐私顾虑,以及知识和上下文的缺乏,是关键失败点。
Strong knowledge capabilities correlate with agent success. A small group of production leaders (organizations where on average 61% of agentic projects advance beyond pilot) have stronger knowledge capabilities than the rest, especially when it comes to semantics. This advantage tracks closely with their higher production rate. 强大的知识能力与智能体的成功相关。一小群投产领先者(其平均 61% 的智能体项目能推进到试点之后)拥有比其他组织更强的知识能力,尤其是在语义方面。这一优势与其更高的投产率密切相关。
Fragmented data hugely complicates knowledge access. Data fragmentation (the inadequate sharing of data across systems) was most commonly cited as a top challenge to expanding agents’ access to knowledge (cited by 55%). Production leaders, by contrast, are more likely to see security and privacy concerns as a major concern (cited by 72% of this group).碎片化数据极大增加了知识获取的难度。数据碎片化(系统之间数据共享不足)最常被列为扩大智能体对知识获取的首要挑战(55% 的受访者提及)。相比之下,投产领先者更可能将安全与隐私顾虑视为主要问题(该群体中有 72% 提及)。
Most firms aim to strengthen the link between data and agents. Among steps that can yield higher quality agent decisions, executives expect the biggest impact to come from strengthening the structural foundation between the organization’s data and its AI agents. The experts we interviewed see a knowledge layer as a prime way to achieve this.大多数公司都希望加强数据与智能体之间的联系。在可带来更高质量智能体决策的举措中,高管们预计最大影响将来自加强组织数据与其 AI 智能体之间的结构基础。我们采访的专家认为,知识层是实现这一目标的主要方式。
Investment priorities to boost knowledge range from pipelines to knowledge graphs. To expand agent access to knowledge, organizations will prioritize investments in retrieval technologies, like ingestion pipelines, AI-ready APIs, and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG); in AI evaluation agents; and in knowledge graphs.为增强知识而优先投资的方向涵盖从管道到知识图谱。为扩大智能体对知识的获取,组织将优先投资检索技术,如数据摄取管道、AI 就绪 API 和检索增强生成(RAG);投资 AI 评估智能体;以及投资知识图谱。
This content was produced by Insights, MIT Technology Review’s custom content arm, not its editorial staff. It was researched and written by humans, with any AI tools that may have been used limited to production processes under human oversight. 本内容由 MIT Technology Review 的定制内容部门 Insights 制作,而非其编辑团队。内容由人工研究和撰写,可能使用的任何 AI 工具仅限于在人工监督下的制作流程。
Deep Dive深度解析
Artificial intelligence
Don’t be fooled—LLMs don’t reason别被误导——LLM 并不会推理
Ten years after AlphaGo’s match against Go champion Lee Sedol, today’s AI still isn’t tapping into the machinery that made that win possible.在 AlphaGo 与围棋冠军李世石对弈十年之后,今天的 AI 仍未利用上当年使那场胜利成为可能的机制。
AI’s recursive self-improvement might not come so quickly after allAI 的递归式自我改进或许终究不会来得那么快
AI agents are not yet creative enough to carry out genuinely innovative open-ended AI research, it seems.看起来,AI 智能体还不够有创造力,无法开展真正创新的开放式 AI 研究。
Don’t be fooled by this summer of AI hype 别被今夏的 AI 炒作所迷惑
Breathless claims about AGI and new capabilities fall apart pretty quickly under scrutiny.那些关于 AGI 和新能力的、令人喘不过气的说法,一经审视便很快站不住脚。
These startups are chasing the next big thing in LLMs这些初创公司正在追逐 LLM 领域的下一件大事
Meet the new kids nipping at the heels of the AI giants.来认识一下那些紧追 AI 巨头的新秀。
Stay connected保持联系
Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review获取 MIT Technology Review 的最新动态
Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.发现特别优惠、热门报道、即将举行的活动等。